| Home | Membership | Committee | Calendar | Gallery |
| Forum | Bedeguar Project | Publications | Verification | Links |
Verification of Gall Records
By Margaret Redfern, 2 Victoria Road, Sheffield S10 2DL
Many members of the BPGS, armed with a copy of British Plant Galls (Redfern,
Shirley & Bloxham, 2002), will find that they can confidently identify most of
the common galls they encounter, at least after they have had some experience.
Novice cecidologists should attend as many field meetings as they can (these are
advertised in the BPGS Calendar each year), where they will find more
experienced people always willing to give newcomers a helping hand. But however
experienced we become, we regularly come across galls that are difficult to
identify or that require determination of the causer, or for which we’d like a
second opinion. The purpose of this paper is to outline the procedure of
verification for those galls that create problems.
One of the aims of the BPGS is to build up knowledge of the distribution of
galls in Britain with the eventual aim of producing distribution maps for every
species, and in this endeavour we need large numbers of records of galls from
all parts of the British Isles. So, we’d like to encourage as many of you as
possible to record the galls that you find and to send your records to The Data
Records Manager (her address is on the back cover of Cecidology). You will soon
find that you are able contribute to this project. Most people will be able to
identify most of the galls they encounter, but there will often be some
uncertainties, galls that do not quite fit the key, and some that you have not
come across before. The points that follow indicate the procedure that should be
taken to identify and verify these problematic galls.
The BPGS experts willing to verify identification of galls and their causers in the following groups (their addresses are given at the end):
If you suspect that your gall is new to Britain or is a new county record, the
causer must be identified and verified by a taxonomist expert in the group. If
an insect, it may need to be reared to the adult stage. The BPGS expert to whom
you send your gall will attempt to rear and identify it, or will send it to the
appropriate taxonomist.
The experts listed are all busy people and will not welcome galls from people
who have not attempted to identify them themselves. On the other hand, they will
welcome problems – galls that turn out to be rare or unusual or to be new
records.
The keys in British Plant Galls are designed for typical galls that are mature
and healthy. Even familiar ones may cause problems if they are young or if the
gall causer has been parasitised, or if the gall contains inquilines; then they
may be smaller than usual or enlarged and with a distorted shape. So, be aware
of this and, if possible, check several individuals to find a typical gall. Most
galls in the following groups should be straightforward to identify, and should
not need verification:
The main problem groups, which should be verified and their causers determined, are:
Eriophyid mite gall taxonomy is confused on many host plants (e.g. Acer, Betula,
Sorbus, Tilia, Ulmus) mainly because identification has relied on the gall with
no reference to the mite. Work is in progress on mite determination but will
proceed slowly because there are so few expert eriophyid taxonomists in Britain
or elsewhere. For the time being, determine mite galls as accurately as possible
and take part in the mite identification project described in Cecidology (2004,
vol. 19 (1), pp. 22-24).
The publication of British Plant Galls in 2002 has stimulated searches for galls
and their identification, and the last few years have seen many advances in the
study of galls. Since publication, the names of some gall causers have changed
and there are other improvements that will be made to the keys – a full revision
is planned for 2007. In the meantime, because the stock of keys is low, the 2002
edition is being reprinted. We are taking the opportunity to update the names
and to note some important amendments in a leaflet that will be inserted into
each copy of the reprint. A copy of this leaflet is distributed with this copy
of Cecidology so that members already owning British Plant Galls will receive a
copy of this leaflet in the next number of Cecidology can use it to update the
keys. We will put the amendments on to the website, too. Other papers that have
appeared in Cecidology in recent years provide information to update the keys,
and I recommend that you annotate your copies with this information.
Names and addresses of experts listed above:
Brian Gale, 6 Roker Way, Fair Oak, Eastleigh, Hampshire SO50 7LD.
Dr Keith Harris, 81 Linden Way, Ripley, Woking, Surrey GU23 6LP.
Dr Tom Preece, Kinton, Turner’s Lane, Llynclys Hill, Oswestry, Shropshire SY10
8LL.
Dr Margaret Redfern, 2 Victoria Road, Sheffield S10 2DL.
John Robbins, 123b Parkgate Road, Coventry CV6 4GF.
Peter Shirley, 72 Dagger Lane, West Bromwich, West Midlands B71 4BS.
Dr Brian Spooner, 31 Balmoral Crescent, West Molsey, Surrey KT8 1QA.
Robin Williams, Kynton’s Mead, Heath House, Wedmore, Somerset BS28 4UQ.
Reference
Redfern, M., Shirley, P.R. & Bloxham, M. (2002) British Plant Galls.
Identification of galls on plants and fungi. Field Studies 10: 207-531.
(This article, revised slightly, appeared in Cecidology, 20 (1): 6-9, in 2005.)